This real story more crazy than our AI video could ever be, so we asked from GPT to make this article and asked to give the credits to sources and yes we added our AI video to the bottom of the page.
A British Jewish lawyer was detained for almost ten hours by the Metropolitan Police after officers claimed his small silver Star of David necklace “antagonised” pro-Palestinian protesters outside the Israeli embassy in London.
The incident — caught on police interview video obtained by The Telegraph — has triggered outrage across Jewish communities and free-speech circles, with critics accusing police of treating Jewish identity as a public-order risk.
The arrest outside the Israeli embassy
On the evening of 29 August 2025, the man — a lawyer in his forties acting as an independent legal observer — attended a large pro-Palestine demonstration in Kensington.
Wearing sunglasses, a hat, and a snood for anonymity, he also wore a two-centimetre Star of David pendant that his girlfriend had given him.
Officers claimed he crossed from the designated “counter-protest” pen into the main rally several times, breaching a Section 14 Public Order Act condition intended to separate opposing groups.
He was handcuffed, placed in a police van, and held at Hammersmith station until 4:30 a.m., after which he was released on bail — a status that, six weeks later, remains active.
During his interrogation, a detective asked whether wearing the Star of David had been “stoking the fire,” prompting his solicitor to object that the line of questioning was inappropriate and potentially discriminatory.
“They are trying to criminalise the wearing of a Star of David”
Speaking to The Telegraph, the lawyer said:
“It is outrageous that police should claim wearing a Star of David somehow antagonises people. They have crossed the line. They are trying to criminalise the wearing of a Star of David. In an environment of antisemitism, I will not be cowed.”
He said he had recorded around 30 incidents of hate speech and criminal behaviour by protesters — including being called a “Zionist baby killer” — yet none resulted in prosecutions.
Other observers described the arrest as “deeply demoralising.”
Former Met sergeant Gill Levy, who also attended as a legal observer, told The Telegraph:
“How can the symbol of Judaism cause such antagonism that police got involved? Surely the problem is with the person who is offended, not the person wearing it.”
Metropolitan Police response
In statements repeated across The Telegraph, AP News, and Ynet, the Metropolitan Police denied that the arrest was because of the Star of David itself:
“The claim that this man was arrested for wearing a Star of David necklace is not true,” a Met spokesman said. “He was arrested for allegedly repeatedly breaching conditions that kept opposing protest groups apart. Over the course of an hour, he continuously approached the pro-Palestinian area to film them, provoking a reaction. After multiple warnings, he was arrested.”
Police said the conditions applied to groups “Stop the Hate” (pro-Israel) and “IJAN — International Jewish Anti-Zionist Network,” which organised the protest.
However, the interview footage reviewed by The Telegraph shows a detective admitting that officers at the scene believed the Star of David was “antagonising the situation further.”
The contradiction has fuelled criticism that the symbol played a significant role in his detention.
Israeli and community reactions
Israel’s foreign minister Gideon Sa’ar condemned the incident:
“The Star of David is a symbol of Jewish identity, not provocation. The fact that Jews are warned in central London not to display it publicly shows how rampant antisemitism in pro-Palestinian marches has poisoned the streets. This is a moral disgrace.”
Jewish community groups in Britain called for an independent review of policing at protests.
The Board of Deputies of British Jews said the case illustrates “a worrying trend where visibly Jewish individuals are told their presence or symbols are problematic.”
The Community Security Trust (CST) noted a spike of more than 600 antisemitic incidents in London during 2025’s Gaza-war protests, warning that the climate “normalises harassment against Jews in public space.”
Political backdrop
The controversy comes amid criticism of Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer for allowing mass anti-Israel marches to continue following antisemitic violence, including the Yom Kippur murders of two Jews in Manchester earlier that month.
Opponents say the government’s leniency toward radical protesters contrasts sharply with the treatment of pro-Israel demonstrators and observers, raising accusations of “two-tier policing.”
Human-rights lawyers told The Times that wearing religious symbols is protected under the Human Rights Act 1998 and Equality Act 2010, and that any interference must be “necessary and proportionate.”
The case, they said, “will test whether fear of public reaction can justify restricting religious expression.”
Inside the police interview
According to The Telegraph’s transcript, the detective, normally attached to the robbery unit, questioned the suspect about his political leanings before asking:
“What necklace are you wearing?”
When shown the Star of David, the officer replied that other officers felt “its presence was antagonising the situation.”
The lawyer’s representative objected, calling the question inappropriate, while the detective insisted he meant no offence but stressed that “in a hostile environment… the emblem could inflame tensions.”
The exchange ended with the lawyer responding:
“Notwithstanding the fact we shouldn’t be in a situation where people can’t walk around wearing a sign of their religion.”
A chilling precedent
Observers have drawn parallels between this incident and the April 2024 Gideon Falter case, when another Jewish man was told by a Met officer that being “openly Jewish” near a pro-Palestinian march could be “provocative.”
Although the Met apologised for that remark, this latest episode suggests the underlying issue remains unresolved.
Civil-rights analysts warn that labelling Jewish symbols as potential provocations risks legitimising discrimination under the guise of public-order policing.
Free-speech advocates note that once religious symbols are treated as “antagonistic,” all minorities become vulnerable.
Aftermath and continuing inquiry
The detained lawyer continues to face bail conditions while the investigation proceeds. He insists he did nothing wrong:
“I will keep wearing my Star of David. I refuse to hide who I am.”
The Met has not announced any internal disciplinary review, though Jewish and legal organisations are urging one.
Meanwhile, the Society of Independent Legal Observers (SILO) — the group the lawyer co-founded to monitor protests — said it will pursue legal avenues to ensure such treatment “never happens again.”
Broader implications
The case has become a symbolic flashpoint in Britain’s debate over free expression, policing, and antisemitism.
For Jewish Londoners, it evokes a painful echo of Europe’s past — where displaying Jewish symbols once invited hostility — and raises an uncomfortable question:
Can a Star of David still be worn freely on British streets? Even GPT do not know 🙁
Sources article:
Primary reporting from The Telegraph (Robert Mendick & Patrick Sawer, 18 Oct 2025); supplementary context from The Times, AP News, i24 News, Ynet, and Jerusalem Post.
📎 Read the original Telegraph article
Sources video Read the original Telegraph article:
